Goldtalk Forum  

Go Back   Goldtalk Forum > News and Politics > Free-For-All
Portal Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Free-For-All Discuss miscellaneous issues and events.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 11-19-2010, 6:06 PM
David David is offline
The Host
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 60,142
David is a splendid one to beholdDavid is a splendid one to beholdDavid is a splendid one to beholdDavid is a splendid one to beholdDavid is a splendid one to beholdDavid is a splendid one to beholdDavid is a splendid one to behold
Default Media Distorts GM "Comeback"

Have you noticed this? GM has never come close to repaying the taxpayers for the bailout. Pundits say the bailout saved thousands of jobs. Nonsense. It created a "zombie" corporation. Another car builder would have swooped in (from China?) to take possession of GM facilities and hire thousands.
The Cadillac of Bad Ideas
By David Harsanyi

Oh, good, the Obama administration has another imaginary victory for taxpayers to celebrate.

As you've probably heard, there's quite a bit of hubbub surrounding the news that the administration's car company has gone public.



President Barack Obama tells us that General Motors' initial public offering is proof that one of the toughest tales of recession "took another step to becoming a success story." Not "survival," but success. Taxpayers are going to make a profit, even!

Now, admittedly, success is a malleable concept. If by success we mean that General Motors still owes the government $43 billion -- not including that piddling $15 billion it borrowed to fund its financial arm -- and that many analysts are uncertain it can ever flourish, we're home free.

Success will mean temporarily setting aside the fact that the Treasury actually lost billions on the IPO as it "bought" GM stock at inflated prices. To break even on the freshly printed money taxpayers are "getting back" will probably mean GM needs to double in value over the next year to make us whole.

Do you feel whole? I do.

Don't worry. Not only is GM equipped with an array of unmerited advantages over companies operating successfully in the marketplace -- even without blank checks from taxpayers -- but also the IPO was exempted from federal and state anti-fraud laws just to make sure things still aren't exactly fair. (Then again, every GM success comes at the expense of someone else.)

If things get tough, we can rely on Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to trump up safety concerns regarding Toyota or Honda to correct the problem.

Success also means that Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and other institutions saved from extinction by taxpayers can now make hundreds of millions of dollars on an IPO from a company that only exists because of taxpayers.

It reminds me of the success we experienced the last time GM paid back taxpayers, when it utilized funds from a TARP escrow account rather than actual revenue. Paying back taxpayers with taxpayer dollars is an inventive accounting method, for sure.

And let's not forget that success is predicated on this president's strong-arming bondholders and essentially wiping out shareholders of a private company -- tearing up legal contracts rather than allowing a traditional bankruptcy. Success means shielding benefits of United Auto Workers as a reward for helping make cars that are less efficient and more expensive.

At the time, George Mason University law professor Todd Zywicki wrote that by "stepping over the bright line between the rule of law and the arbitrary behavior of men," the president "may have created a thousand new failing businesses."

Confiscating the property of investors for the common good isn't generally conducive to a healthy business environment.

Sean McAlinden of the Center for Automotive Research told NPR that investors may want to ask the new GM: "By the way, the last set of shareholders and bondholders you had, you totally screwed them. So why should I trust you now on nine months' worth of results?"

They may want to also ask why GM is making ideologically motivated money-losers, such as the Volt, a car the middle class won't be able to afford, even with massive subsidies. What happens when taxpayers divest themselves from GM's social engineering projects?

Taxpayers didn't have much of a choice in the matter on the front end. It'll be nice to see GM stand on its own -- until the next time.

But when we undermine the rule of law, ignore property rights, create moral hazards and destroy organic job growth to save a company that was terribly managed long before the recession, no one should brag about success.
Reach columnist David Harsanyi at dharsanyi@denverpost.com.

Page Printed from: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...as_108008.html at November 19, 2010 - 05:02:37 PM PST
__________________
You can teach me lots of lessons
You can bring me lots of gold
But you just can't live in Texas
If you don't have lots of soul

Doug Sahm
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:48 PM..


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2007, Goldtalk