![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
By now you have seen the rant. I posted Santelli's rant in the thread on the mortgage bailout outrage. White House is clearly worried about Santelli's sentiments catching on.
White House declares war on CNBC ranterSOURCE
__________________
You can teach me lots of lessons You can bring me lots of gold But you just can't live in Texas If you don't have lots of soul Doug Sahm |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I believe he said something that regular Joe's understand - why are they paying for someone else's problems. This is not charity, this legalized theft. This is the taking of the most basic of rights - property - at the point of legally imposed gun. Naturally, most of us understood this now and with any governmental program that attempts to legislation from the false premise of fairness (and we've ranted against such stupidity REGARDLESS of administration or who controls the congress!) We need more "reporters" to speak truth and even show some emotion than just drinking the kool-aid.
__________________
William Wallace: It's all for nothing if you don't have freedom. William Wallace: Every man dies, not every man really lives. *** Avatar *** Hotter-N-Hell 100 Finish - 28 August 2009 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
THE COMING POPULIST BACKLASH By Charlie Sykes Against the Democrats. Michael Lind wonders whether the Democrats have any idea what is building out here in fly-over country. First they came for the bankers. Then they came for the CEOs. Then they came for the liberals. That might be the epitaph of the Democratic Party, if Democrats cannot learn to surf the tsunami of populism created by the economic earthquake. If the Obama administration doesn’t start to deal with the populist wave headed for Washington, Republicans will tap a reservoir of resentment that could destroy his presidency. ... As more Americans lose their jobs and their homes, as more businesses crater and banks topple, popular anger is rising like a wall of water over a suddenly quiet beachfront resort. You’d think that the Democrats in Washington would be aware of the danger. After all, the massive expansion of Great Society spending in the 1960s, followed by the stagflation of the 1970s, allowed the marginal conservative movement to tap populist anger and dominate American politics for a generation. Substitute stimulus for Great Society and years of possible “stag-deflation” for stagflation, and you have a scenario in which the Obama’s overwhelming majority could collapse as quickly as LBJ’s. http://www.620wtmj.com/shows/charliesykes/39772417.html |